May 21, 2011
Doest this type of HHO System to save fuel on cars and trucks really work?
Take a look and tell me if its possible http://halfwaterhalfgas.com/
Related Product:
Halo: Combat EvolvedMODEL- MS-CD46618WI VENDOR- MICROSOFT CORPORATION FEATURES- Microsoft Halo PC 1.0: Combat Evolved Halo PC 1.0 Win32 English NA DVD Box CD.... Read More >
Related Posts
Filed under Gas Conservation FAQ by on May 21st, 2011. Comment.
Leave a Comment




Comments on Doest this type of HHO System to save fuel on cars and trucks really work?
Yes 100 mpg
No it’s not possible.
Start with this
“Fortune 500 petroleum companies are trying to keep this from you: ”
Really? Then they aren’t doing a very good job are they, you can only find the plans for this device on your site, the internet, the patent office, etc.
The video doesn’t prove anything. Here’s the math and I’ll be nice and use only a 40% increase and a not so clean car from the 1970′s.
In 1975 the un-burnt hydrocarbons emission was 1.5 grams per mile so to make one gallon of gasoline you would have to drive about 2,500 miles. If HHO, Brown’s Gas or Hydrogen boost was able to burn the un-burnt fuel your mileage would go from 30 MPG to 30.36 or an increase of 1.2%.
Most of they companies recommend that you replace the oxygen sensor or put on a device to lean out the engine (I didn’t see where they recommend that but if they do here were you get the only saving on fuel). If they lean out the engine to 17:1 (anymore than that and you’ll start having lean misfires) that would give you an additional 15%. This will also increase the cylinder temperature and will burn out valves, pistons, and heads, as well as increase the NOx and break a few federal laws in the process.
That gives us a total of 16.2% increase. We have to make up 23.8% of our fuel mileage increase through increase engine efficiency. The maximum theoretical efficiency of an internal combustion engine is right at 37%, with the average engine having an efficiency rating of about 20%. So if our engine was 23.8% more efficient our 20% would increase to 24.76% and there would have to be an increase in HP by the same percentage. So for every 100 HP starting you would increase HP by 23.8 HP. That increase is more the large enough to be measured by ANY shop with a dyno.
Now if you didn’t recommend t replacing the oxygen sensor then you have to increase the engine efficiency by 15% which would mean even more HP.
So the only real saving you receive is to lean out the engine to the point where you will have engine damage. And when you really look at THEIR numbers you see it’s not possible to make THEIR claims.
When you do the math its just a con so save your money, and just so you know I didn’t even show how little HHO you get from their device, or what the energy return is, like I said I just assumed it work and ran through the numbers THEY post at their web site. And they can’t even make the low end of their claims.
i don’t think so, it wont work practically speaking water needs some energy to transfer to steam in case of running a turbine and also when it is used along with inflammable source it will quench or destroy the energy produced by the inflammable source
you have to be kidding, right? Two people have gone to prison trying to sell this junk.
Water is a POWERFUL fuel but…you need the RIGHT match to light it!
WOW, a lie so big that trying to sell this as a truth will get you time in prison.
google Dennis Lee HHO or Geet, you decide if you won’t believe a Licensed Engineer in themodynamics.
I think it will work.